Vintage - erotism homosexual din trecut, volumul 2
135,121 96%
9 ani în urmă
,jpeg/010/506/147/v2/320x180.203.jpg)
,jpeg/003/593/558/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/015/938/471/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/004/325/313/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/004/382/608/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/004/383/400/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/010/075/679/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/004/320/266/1280x720.4.jpg)
,jpeg/015/634/841/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/010/583/398/v2/320x180.246.jpg)
,jpeg/016/479/452/1280x720.3.jpg)
Comentarii
9
Te rog să te conectezi sau să te înregistrezi pentru a posta comentarii.
… wow - did rules dictate that you couldn’t do so much as kiss?! … Ugh, this is so arousing .. probably because of what ISN’T portrayed.. So many beautiful bodies.. yummy asses!
this video proves you don’t need to present explicit sexual activity to be arousing .. I love that this keeps you watching/ guessing .. will we be shown more!
I remember the days of posing pouches, although I wasn't interested in men at that time. The nudist magazines would have pictures of people with their genital areas just totally smooth. It looked just like a toy doll. I was so glad when the magazines started showing nude people with their genitals on display. Unfortunately, today society ISN'T as proper thinking as it was in the period of, let's say, 1966 to the late 1970's as far as nudity is concerned. SAD, SAD, SAD!!!!
… a very interesting look at history.. am curious why (??) there’s no representation of any sexual activity - just hints, insinuations.
Woof